Greyhound trap stats by track
Win rate of every trap at every UK track over the last ~180 days, and its bias versus the field-size baseline (1 ÷ average field). Green = wins more often than chance, red = less. Refreshed nightly. Window: 2026-03-18 → 2026-09-14.
Strongest edge right now: trap 3 at Yarmouth (24.0%, +5.0 pp, 1119 runs); weakest: trap 5 at Harlow (13.6%, -4.2 pp). Across all tracks trap 1 wins 18.9% of races.
| Track | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harlow | 16.8% | 16.4% | 20.5% | 18.8% | 13.6% | 22.6% | 10,689 |
| Towcester | 19.3% | 20.9% | 18.0% | 17.4% | 16.6% | 13.6% | 10,205 |
| Monmore | 20.1% | 15.8% | 19.6% | 17.8% | 16.6% | 17.5% | 9,546 |
| Romford | 20.5% | 19.6% | 18.8% | 16.3% | 16.6% | 15.7% | 9,188 |
| Newcastle | 17.3% | 17.5% | 19.5% | 18.9% | 17.3% | 18.1% | 8,515 |
| Sunderland | 19.6% | 17.9% | 16.9% | 17.1% | 18.1% | 19.2% | 8,477 |
| Central Park | 18.8% | 18.9% | 15.7% | 18.8% | 17.1% | 18.4% | 7,936 |
| Hove | 20.6% | 19.4% | 19.7% | 17.5% | 15.4% | 20.4% | 7,755 |
| Sheffield | 20.6% | 19.4% | 21.3% | 20.3% | 16.8% | 16.5% | 7,013 |
| Kinsley | 14.8% | 16.5% | 20.6% | 18.8% | 15.7% | 16.5% | 6,972 |
| Valley | 18.1% | 17.1% | 18.4% | 16.4% | 19.9% | 20.7% | 6,918 |
| Doncaster | 21.9% | 19.1% | 21.5% | 19.3% | 17.2% | 21.1% | 6,844 |
| Dunstall Park | 17.8% | 17.8% | 18.2% | 16.6% | 16.5% | 15.9% | 6,703 |
| Yarmouth | 18.9% | 18.6% | 24.0% | 19.4% | 15.4% | 18.2% | 6,185 |
| Nottingham | 17.6% | 20.8% | 18.7% | 16.9% | 18.1% | 17.0% | 5,822 |
| Star Pelaw | 20.5% | 18.2% | 19.0% | 19.8% | 20.4% | 17.4% | 4,247 |
| Oxford | 14.0% | 18.4% | 22.6% | 17.3% | 20.9% | 16.7% | 608 |
| Suffolk Downs | 18.5% | 25.8% | 15.9% | 20.6% | 15.5% | 23.6% | 370 |
UK tracks with enough runs only; Irish (GRI) tracks are excluded because of known trap-data defects. Cell = trap win rate; hover for place rate, bias and run count.
Simulated / paper · for research & education · not betting advice
How to read the table
Baseline = 1 ÷ average field size (≈16.7% for six runners). Bias = trap win rate minus baseline; z is the same gap in standard-error units (|z| > 2 is statistically notable). Trap effects are real but small and vary by track and distance — the market already prices them in.